SANTA FE, NM—Today, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of New Mexico applauds Governor Martinez’s signing of HB 483, the bill that creates a fully independent and fully funded New Mexico Public Defender Department (PDD). Previously, the PDD was controlled by the executive branch.
“This bill corrects a critical imbalance in New Mexico’s justice system,” said ACLU-NM Executive Director Peter Simonson. “The New Mexico Public Defender Department plays a crucial role in ensuring people’s constitutional right to a defense, and this new system provides the department the autonomy and objective oversight it needs to protect this fundamental right.”
After voters overwhelmingly approved of Constitutional Amendment 5, the ballot measure that amended Article 6 of the state Constitution to establish the PDD as an independent state agency. The legislature was required to enact legislation to implement the changes. With HB 483, the New Mexico State Legislature set the terms and qualifications for the new independent and non-partisan board which will oversee the new PDD.
“By making the Public Defender Department independent, this change will help buffer the public defense system from the politics that inevitably affect decision making by the executive branch,” said ACLU-NM Public Policy Director Steven Robert Allen. “This is why 42 states, today joined by New Mexico, provide for a Public Defender Department overseen by an independent, non-partisan board.”
The independent Public Defender Department amendment was endorsed by more than 100 public organizations, officials, judges, prosecutors, attorneys and community leaders across New Mexico, as well as the state’s three largest newspapers.

 ###

Date

Monday, April 8, 2013 - 11:07am

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

Style

Standard with sidebar
ALBUQUERQUE, NM—Today, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of New Mexico filed a legal complaint in state district court against the Albuquerque Police Oversight Commission (POC) for suppressing the statements of several community members during their meeting held on December 13, 2012. During this meeting, the plaintiffs, Charles Arasim, Kenneth Ellis, Silvio Dell’Angela and Eli Chavez, all planned to criticize the POC for permitting a commissioner who they believed had  a conflict of interest to remain on the commission. When the people attempted to voice these criticisms during the public comments section of the meeting, the Commission silenced them  and refused to allow any public discussion of the topic.
The plaintiffs in this case are all community advocates against police use of excessive force.  They regularly attend POC meetings to monitor the body’s investigations of alleged incidents of abuse. A New Mexico jury recently ordered the City of Albuquerque to pay 10.7 million dollars in damages to the family of plaintiff Kenneth Ellis after an Albuquerque police officer wrongfully killed his son, Kenneth Ellis III.
“I have the right and obligation to speak out and do everything in my power to ensure that no other father has to go through what I have,” said plaintiff Kenneth Ellis. “The Police Oversight Commission may not like what I have to say, but the First Amendment right to free speech exists for the sole purpose of protecting speech that the Government doesn’t like.”
The complaint alleges that before the public comment section of the December 13 meeting, Commissioner Martinez stated that all public comments would be limited to one specific agenda item, excluding the concerns the plaintiffs held regarding Martinez’s membership in the Fraternal Order of Police Auxiliary—a membership the plaintiffs considered to constitute a conflict of interest due to that organization’s opposition to external police oversight bodies. By limiting the discussion, a deviation from standard commission practice, plaintiffs allege that the commission attempted to silence their criticism. When another attendee, Andrés Valdez, attempted to speak on Commissioner Martinez’s perceived conflict during his allotted time for public comments, Commissioner Richard Shine interrupted his statement and ultimately directed police officers to forcibly remove him from the room. The commission permitted no further discussion of Commissioner Martinez’s perceived conflict of interest during the public comments section of the meeting.
“In our country, every person has the right to engage in political speech and voice their opinion—even if the Government doesn’t like what’s being said, even if the Government doesn't want to hear it,” said ACLU-NM Executive Director Peter Simonson. “Nowhere is this right more important than when speaking out against perceived corruption or misuse of government power. The POC cannot attempt to silence criticism of public officials during the designated public comments period.”
The suit seeks punitive and compensatory damages against the POC for violating the plaintiff’s First Amendment right to free speech
Read a copy of the complaint here
ACLU-NM Staff Attorney Alexandra Freedman Smith and ACLU-NM cooperating attorney Josh Ewing of Ewing & Ewing PC represent the plaintiffs in this case.
 

###

 
 
 

Date

Tuesday, April 2, 2013 - 12:34pm

Featured image

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Police Practices

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

Style

Standard with sidebar


ALBUQUERQUE, NM—Today, two same-sex couples seeking the freedom to marry filed a lawsuit in Albuquerque’s district court after they applied for and were denied marriage licenses. The lawsuit claims that the New Mexico marriage statutes and New Mexico Constitution do not bar same-sex couples from marrying, and therefore the State of New Mexico should issue civil marriage licenses to any same-sex couple who applies for one. The couples are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the ACLU of New Mexico, the National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR), the Albuquerque law firm Sutin, Thayer & Browne, APC, and local cooperating attorneys Maureen Sanders, Lynn Perls, and Kate Girard.  

 New Mexico is the only state in the country that does not either explicitly recognize same-sex relationships through marriage or civil unions or ban recognition of same-sex relationships by statute or constitutional amendment.
The couples are Miriam Rand, 63, and Ona Porter, 66, and Rose Griego, 47, and Kim Kiel, 44. Miriam and Ona currently live in Albuquerque, while Rose and Kim reside in Santa Fe.
“Ona and I have been together for over 25 years,” said Miriam Rand. “Together, we raised children, we took care of our mothers when they were dying and are currently raising our granddaughter. We are family; we love and care for one another through good times and bad. We want our community to recognize our love and commitment for what it is: a marriage.”


“Marriage matters,” said Rose Griego. “Kim and I have already made a lifelong commitment to one another, but marriage says ‘family’ in a way that no other word can. It’s important to us that the State of New Mexico—our home, the place where we live, work and raised our family—recognizes and respects our relationship.”


Said ACLU of New Mexico Legal Director Laura Schauer Ives: “The time has come for New Mexico to treat same-sex couples with the same dignity and respect we afford opposite-sex couples. This means allowing loving, committed same-sex couples the freedom to marry. We believe that the New Mexico Constitution guarantees same-sex couples this freedom. Today we ask the courts to clarify and confirm that same-sex couples may seek happiness and protect their families within the institution of civil marriage in New Mexico.”


Added National Center for Lesbian Rights Legal Director Shannon Minter: “New Mexico has a long history of respecting individual freedom and supporting families. These couples want the same opportunity to marry and to take responsibility for one another as other couples.”


“There is growing support nationwide for the freedom of to marry, with over fifty percent of Americans now saying they support marriage for same-sex couples,” said Elizabeth Gill, staff attorney with the ACLU Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgender Project. “It is time for this fundamental freedom to be a reality for same-sex couples in New Mexico.”

Meet the Plaintiffs

Download the Legal Complaint

###

 
The American Civil Liberties Union is our nation's guardian of liberty, working daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country. www.aclu.org
 
The ACLU of New Mexico is an affiliate of the national ACLU, working in the courts, legislature and communities to protect and extend individual rights and liberties for all New Mexicans. www.aclu-nm.org.


The National Center for Lesbian Rights is a national legal organization committed to advancing the human and civil rights of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community through litigation, public policy advocacy, and public education. www.NCLRights.org
 
Sutin, Thayer & Browne, with offices in Albuquerque and Santa Fe, is one of New Mexico's largest law firms, providing exceptional legal services since 1946.  More information is available at www.sutinfirm.com
 

Date

Thursday, March 21, 2013 - 1:00pm

Featured image

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

LGBTQ+ Rights

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of New Mexico RSS