LOS LUNAS – Surveillance video from the Central New Mexico Corrections Facility (CNMCF) in Los Lunas show guards standing by as an incarcerated man is brutally attacked, raising troubling concerns about the well-being of people in the custody of the New Mexico Corrections Department.

The incident also appears to contradict an incident report submitted by corrections staff that states the incarcerated men attacking the victim did so to protect a guard from harm.

The video from August 10, obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of New Mexico, shows two individuals identified by a source and an incident report as Captain Jesse Diaz and Corrections Officer Cameron Watson watching as four incarcerated men punch and kick another in-custody man.

The incident took place in an empty housing unit on the main compound of CNMCF’s Reception and Diagnostic Center. It starts with Watson entering the housing unit with the eventual attack victim.

Once inside, the officer empties his pockets in an act that could indicate he was preparing to engage in a physical altercation. A long-time NMCD employee speaking on the condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to discuss the incident said it is not uncommon for an incarcerated individual and corrections staff to handle disputes via fighting.

The guard in question, the source said, has a reputation of frequently engaging in physical altercations with people in custody. But even multiple Office of Professional Standards force reports may not result in repercussions.

"Most are handled in house by our own captains and unit managers, so of course we protect our own,” the source said.

Watson and the victim engage in an animated conversation before they are joined by four more incarcerated individuals and Diaz. Eventually, Watson and the victim descend into an area below a stairway partially obscured from the view of the security camera.

After a few seconds, the captain and the four men appear to start leaving the housing unit when one of the incarcerated men turns around and walks over toward the victim, who is facing Watson. The first individual then begins punching and kicking the victim, who does not appear to attempt to fight back. A few seconds into the attack, the three other individuals joined the beating.

Neither the captain nor the corrections officer attempted to stop the more than 30-second-long attack Once it is over, the four incarcerated men walk away. Neither guard appears to render medical aid to the victim.

The incident report submitted by Diaz, also obtained by the ACLU of New Mexico, states that the four individuals who attacked the victim did so after allegedly hearing the victim threaten Watson with physical violence.

According to Diaz, he was called to the housing unit with Watson and the victim because the victim was refusing to work. When Watson allegedly offered to show the victim how to perform the work required, the victim threatened to fight the guard, according to Diaz’s narrative.

That’s when the other inmates – whose presence in the housing unit the report does not explain – attacked the victim.

“[The victim] went to the floor and I was giving directive for inmates to stop they did comply,” Diaz wrote, saying all the men were then taken for medical checks. One of the attackers, according to Diaz, “stated that he was not going to let the officer get hurt because he respected the officer for doing his job.”

The surveillance video, however, does not suggest that the victim was a threat to either of the guards and he appears completely unprepared for the attack once it begins. Three of the four attackers and the victim were placed in solitary confinement pending disciplinary processes. For unknown reasons a fourth individual seen in the video engaged in the melee is not mentioned in the report.

The guards’ inaction appears to be contrary to the department’s ethics policy that requires correctional officials to protect the rights of those in their custody.

“Employees will respect and protect the civil and legal rights of all persons placed in the NMCD's custody or under its supervision,” the policy states.

In the U.S. Supreme Court case Farmer v. Brennan, the court ruled that it is a violation of an incarcerated individual’s rights under the Eighth Amendment when a prison official knows that an incarcerated person faces the risk of harm and does nothing to mitigate it.

NMCD’s policy dictates that officials are responsible for safeguarding the well-being of people in the department’s custody and allows them to use or show force to stop an attack. That does not appear to have happened in this incident.

“In the use of force policy, it says we are to use force to stop assault, battery, self-harm or any act of violence,” the source said. “They can’t hide the fact that [the guard] never called for additional responders or help of any kind nor attempted to help. It is pretty obvious.”

Editorial Note: The ACLU of New Mexico chose to blur the faces of incarcerated individuals in this video and to refrain from naming them in order to protect the identity of people in NMCD custody and who could face retaliation for their involvement in this incident. The guards are identified as government employees and law enforcement officials entrusted with protecting the well-being of people in the departments’ custody.

Date

Wednesday, September 21, 2022 - 1:30pm

Featured image

A prison guard watches as a person is assaulted in CNMCF.

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Corrections Reform

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

17

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

Show list numbers

Rotimi Adeoye, he/him/his, Former Communications Strategist, ACLU

There are many offices up for election across the nation this November. Whether it’s for a district attorney in your town or a governor’s race in your state, we want to give you the tools to vote your values and have informed conversations with your friends and families. Elections take place once every few years, and every single one can have lasting effects on our rights, liberties, and democracy.

There should be no doubt that throughout American history, elections can sometimes lead to the rollback of all of our civil rights. That’s why it’s important to vote for your values and fight for your rights this November.



The Election of 1968 – President Nixon wins and ushers in an era of mass incarceration.

Shortly after Nixon was elected in 1968, his administration declared a war on drugs, a radical approach focused on harsher enforcement and penalties for drug-related offenses that disproportionately targeted Black communities. The campaign was a racist response to the civil rights movement of the 1960s.

Presidents after Nixon have continued its harsh and racist logic, including Presidents Reagan and Clinton. And these harmful federal policies were adopted by lawmakers and prosecutors at the state and local levels.

Drug war policies such as mandatory minimum sentences, especially for minor drug-related offenses, and sentencing disparities for powder vs. crack cocaine, helped make the United States the world’s infamous leader in mass incarceration.

The war on drugs has had profound effects on the criminal legal system, American politics, and the lives of Black communities and other communities of color. Since 1970, our incarcerated population has increased by 500 percent — 2 million people are in jail or prison today. One out of every three Black boys born today can expect to go to prison in his lifetime, as can one of every six Latino boys — compared to one of every 17 white boys.

The war on drugs has also doubled the number of women who are incarcerated, with Black women representing 30 percent of all incarcerated women and Latina women representing 16 percent. As a result, 1.5 million children have incarcerated parents.


The Election of 2000 - President George W. Bush is elected and launches the “war on terror” in response to 9/11.

Following the election of President Bush and the tragic attacks of 9/11, President Bush launched an all-out attack on human rights and civil liberties. Bush’s actions launched an era defined by excessive claims of executive power that weakened our system of checks and balances and democratic accountability. Most consequentially for human lives and rights, the Bush administration engaged in systemic torture, indefinite detention at Guantánamo and elsewhere, warrantless mass surveillance, biased and unfair watch listing, and discriminatory profiling of Muslim, Brown, and Black communities in the United States.

President Bush’s legacy is one our country — and the people around the world whose lives his administration blighted — still grapples with today.


The Election of 2016 – One of the most lawless administrations is ushered in with President Donald J. Trump.

The moment President Trump was elected set in motion endless attacks on civil rights and liberties. President Trump was one of most lawless presidents in modern history. From his nomination of Supreme Court justices who rolled back the federal right to abortion secured in Roe v. Wade, to the Muslim ban executive order that discriminated against people from Muslim-majority countries, his administration led a dangerous rollback of our rights and liberties, many of which are still being felt today. The ACLU filed 400 legal actions against the Trump administration.

Date

Friday, September 16, 2022 - 12:00pm

Featured image

Voting booths lined up at polling station during in a public school in Brooklyn, New York.

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Override default banner image

Voting booths lined up at polling station during in a public school in Brooklyn, New York.

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Share Image

ACLU: Share image

Related issues

Reproductive Freedom Immigrants’ Rights LGBTQ+ Rights

Show related content

Imported from National NID

51549

Menu parent dynamic listing

17

Imported from National VID

52337

Imported from National Link

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Centered single-column (no sidebar)

Teaser subhead

Elections in 1968, 2000, and 2016 prompted significant rollbacks of civil liberties. We can’t repeat history in 2022.

Show list numbers

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of New Mexico RSS